Skip to main content

Bullpenning is Bad for Baseball and Needs to be Stopped

Image result for sergio romo
Sergio Romo and the Tampa Bay Rays may have started baseball's next big trend. They must be stopped.

   
     The Tampa Bay Rays may have very well kickstarted baseball's next revolution. On May 24th, the Tampa Bay Rays announced that relief pitchers would start their series against the Baltimore Orioles. This strategy, which has been pushed heavily by MLB Network host Brian Kenny is called 'bullpenning'. It would involve a pitcher called the 'Opener' to start the first inning of a game. The game's starter then comes in and pitches innings 2-6 (or 7) and then relief pitchers take over the remainder game. I won't lie, bullpenning is a genius strategy. However, I hope it goes the way of the dodo before it has a chance to really take root. Bullpenning is a symptom of what's bad for the game.
     I should note before I make my argument that I am not some baseball traditionalist that is resistant to any change. I am in favor of doing away with the win-loss record for pitchers, I am for the designated hitter being used in the National League, I am for extended netting around the foul lines of  the field, I am for the use of instant replay, and I am for computers calling balls and strikes as soon as the technology is there. These reforms (with the exception of the DH in the National League) to the game have either improved the way baseball has been officiated or has improved fan safety. They haven't really changed how baseball is fundamentally played.
     Bullpenning on the other hand would radically change how baseball is played. It is also an outgrowth of a major problem that is plaguing baseball: The over-reliance on relief pitchers.
     Many teams in today's game have eight men in the bullpen and that number gets higher once you count guys that come up from the minors for a cup of coffee. It's become increasingly common for managers to use three pitchers just to record three outs in an inning. The 2017 Postseason could be utterly unbearable to watch because starters were frequently chased out of the game early and an endless amount of relief pitchers were paraded in.
     Limiting the amount of pitchers used in a game would help solve the issues of there being too many strikeouts and not enough offense. Offense has plummeted and strikeouts are up because nearly every pitcher that is active throws 95 miles per hour and above. Hitters also share the blame for this trend (but that's an article for a different time). The sheer amount of pitchers that throw at a high velocity have smothered offense to the point where strikeouts have now eclipsed hits for the first time in Major League history. There's even a name for this phenomenon. It's called Baseball’s Three True Outcomes, which means that more than a third of all plate appearances end in a walk, a strikeout, or a home run. People won't watch a game where nothing exciting happens. If we limit the amount of relief pitchers that can be used in a game, maybe starting pitchers will dial their velocity back slightly when they realize that that they are expected to go beyond the fifth inning. Relievers would also dial back on their velocity when they realize that they need to face more than one batter a game. Offense very well may increase if pitcher stop throwing as hard in order to go deeper into games. Pace of play would also be greatly improved because you won't have constant pitching changes which delays the game. I'm not advocating that we go back to the era where starting pitchers threw 300 innings, but starters should be held to a higher standard than they have been in recent years.
     Bullpenning is a genius strategy that is in its infancy, but once a trend takes hold in baseball it becomes almost impossible to stop which why it must be stopped now. Bullpenning will cause new and casual baseball fans to be driven away. What attracts the new and casual fans is offense and you can't attract new and casual fans when there is no offense to be found.
If you like this article, please feel free to follow me on Twitter: @TheWacoKid6

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Time for the National League to Adopt the Designated Hitter Rule

     It is time for the National League to join the modern age and adopt the Designated Hitter (DH) rule. The National League has held onto the archaic tradition of pitchers hitting for far too long. The DH rule has been one of the best changes that has been made to the game of baseball. The game would be much healthier and more exciting to watch if the DH rule was universally adopted.      I understand that this is a divisive issue. Pro-DH rule people and anti-DH rule people are just as divided on this subject as Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck are when they argue about whether or not it is rabbit season or duck season. That last part may be an exaggeration, but the Designated Hitter rule debate goes like this every time it is brought up by Major League Baseball:      MLB: Maybe we should look into the National League trying out the DH rule.      American League: Good idea!      National League: Screw that! We ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Movie Review: Chappaquiddick

Chappaquiddick (2017) was released fifty years too late. That was my thought when I first sat down to watch this movie on Netflix and that was my thought when I finished it. I'm a millennial and I bet that the majority of Americans under the age of 40 (and maybe even under the age of fifty) have no idea what the Chappaquiddick Incident even was. If you were to ask someone what Chappaquiddick is they would probably reply with a shrug and say that it's some Native American term (it is, but that's besides the point). It's a shame that this incident isn't taught in history or political science classes. Chappaquiddick is one of the defining moments in American politics in the last fifty years. It laid bare the obvious fact that if one has the right amount of money, one has the right connections, and that one has the right last name  then you are essentially above the law. Chappaquiddick was directed by John Curan with a screenplay by Taylor Allen and Andrew Logan...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: DC: The New Frontier

     DC: The New Frontier was a six-issue mini-series written and drawn by Darwyn Cooke. The series was published by DC Comics in 2004. The New Frontier takes place in an alternate timeline from 1945, 1948 and from 1952 to 1960. It involves characters from DC’s Golden Age like Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman meeting characters from DC’s Silver Age like The Flash, Green Lantern, and Martian Manhunter. The New Frontier captures what a strange time the 1950s and early 1960s were. It was a time of optimism and seemingly endless economic prosperity. This optimism manifested itself in the Space Race , where Americans realized that the sky was no longer the limit. However, this era was plagued by racism , communist paranoia , and the fear of nuclear war . All of these real historical issues are told through the lens of DC’s heroes.      What I love about The New Frontier is how it was paced. It’s written like Pulp Fiction (1994), where the characte...
Post a Comment
Read more